A hand holding a smartphone displaying the Kalshi app logo on the screen. The phone screen is bright yellow with a teal square containing the word "Kalshi" in black text. The background features a grid pattern with a large red circle.


Illustration by Tag Hartman-Simkins / Futurism. Source: Cheng Xin / Getty Images

Sign up to see the future, today

Can’t-miss innovations from the bleeding edge of science and tech

Kalshi Sent Bizarre Message to Underage Streamer, Exposing Aggressive Youth Targeting. The prediction market platform Kalshi, increasingly scrutinized for its methods of user acquisition, has drawn sharp criticism following a *Wall Street Journal* investigation revealing its aggressive, and at times ethically questionable, tactics to lure young individuals into its speculative trading ecosystem. The report paints a picture of a company willing to push boundaries, including engaging with minors and encouraging undisclosed sponsorships, all in the pursuit of expanding its user base among the digitally native generations.

A particularly alarming incident highlighted in the *WSJ* exposé involved Kalshi signing a sponsorship deal with a 15-year-old video game streamer known as “vert1d” in September. The intent was for vert1d to promote the platform to his audience on X (formerly Twitter). This partnership, which lasted barely a week, was ultimately terminated not due to any initial ethical qualms about working with a minor, but rather because Kalshi’s legal team belatedly confirmed that such an arrangement was impermissible. The casual and almost regretful tone of the Kalshi employee’s message to vert1d—”Yo brother, legal team confirmed that we can’t work with minors rn. Kinda sad tbh”— underscores a troubling disregard for age restrictions and the potential vulnerabilities of young people on such platforms. The streamer’s current X bio, stating “dont take sponsored deals,” and a subsequent post clarifying “i still like kalshi and have nothing against them,” further illuminate the impressionable nature of this demographic and the lasting impact of such interactions. This incident serves as a stark illustration of the lengths to which prediction markets appear willing to go, seemingly prioritizing rapid growth over robust ethical safeguards.

The strategy of targeting young users, particularly students, is not unique to Kalshi but is a widespread industry practice. The *Wall Street Journal* report details how Polymarket, Kalshi’s primary competitor, has also actively engaged in similar aggressive outreach. Polymarket reportedly offered thousands of dollars to college fraternities to host “epic parties” in exchange for signing up new users, effectively turning social gatherings into recruitment drives for speculative trading. This approach leverages existing social networks and peer influence, normalizing participation in prediction markets within a social context where critical evaluation might be less prominent.

Kalshi, for its part, openly acknowledged its focus on college campuses. In a now-deleted post on X, the company explicitly stated, “College campuses are the best place to spark new financial movements and will play a key role in bringing the next 100M users to prediction markets.” This statement, while removed, clearly articulated their strategic vision: to embed prediction markets into the fabric of university life, viewing students as early adopters who will drive future growth. Although Kalshi now claims to have no active partnerships with student groups, its past actions and stated intentions reveal a clear and sustained effort to cultivate this demographic. The company’s initiative to sponsor college campus clubs, including providing prize money for various activities, further solidified its presence within academic environments.

The use of social media influencers, both official and unofficial, is another cornerstone of this youth-focused marketing strategy. The *WSJ* highlighted the case of Jay Liang, a 19-year-old sophomore at the University of Waterloo, whom Kalshi brought into its sponsorship fold. Liang reportedly hired a classmate to produce a TikTok video that garnered over 50 million views, making it one of Kalshi’s most viral marketing pieces. Critically, this widely viewed content failed to disclose its sponsored nature, a clear violation of advertising ethics and often regulatory guidelines. This lack of transparency is particularly concerning when targeting young audiences who may not be equipped to discern promotional content from organic endorsements. Liang further claimed that a Kalshi supervisor explicitly instructed him to target students because they “spend money recklessly,” an assertion Kalshi vehemently denied, calling it “outrageous and made up.” If true, this allegation would expose a deeply cynical and predatory marketing philosophy.

The rationale behind targeting younger users is, from a marketing perspective, quite straightforward. As Norton Yang, a 19-year-old NYU sophomore reportedly paid by Kalshi for TikTok videos, succinctly put it to the *WSJ*: “It’s more relatable, advertising-wise, when someone your age or in your situation talks about something.” This relatability factor, combined with the innate comfort of Gen Z and Millennials with digital platforms, social media, and online transactions, makes them prime targets. They are digital natives, often more open to novel financial instruments and less tethered to traditional banking or investment avenues. This demographic’s heavy engagement with social media platforms means that influencer marketing campaigns can achieve massive reach and appear more authentic than traditional advertising.

Prediction markets, operating in a somewhat ambiguous regulatory space, often blur the lines between legitimate financial instruments and outright gambling. While Kalshi is regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as an event contract market, the underlying mechanics – betting on the outcome of future events – bear a strong resemblance to sports betting or other forms of gambling. For young users, who may lack comprehensive financial literacy or a full understanding of risk assessment, engaging with these platforms can carry significant dangers. Unlike traditional investment vehicles, which often have longer time horizons and clearer regulatory oversight, prediction markets can encourage impulsive decisions and expose users to rapid, substantial losses. This risk is compounded for college students who may already be grappling with tuition fees, living expenses, and the nascent stages of financial independence.

A January survey underscored the effectiveness of this targeted marketing, revealing that millennials and Gen Z exhibited higher awareness of prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi compared to older demographics. Conversely, older generations were more familiar with traditional sports betting sites. This indicates that the aggressive, digitally-focused campaigns by prediction markets are successfully carving out a niche among younger users, potentially onboarding them into speculative financial activities before they develop mature financial habits or fully grasp the implications of such engagements.

The ethical implications of these practices are profound. Targeting minors, even if partnerships are later rescinded, demonstrates a concerning willingness to disregard established age restrictions designed to protect vulnerable populations. The alleged encouragement to target students who “spend money recklessly” points to a potentially exploitative business model that capitalizes on perceived impulsiveness rather than fostering responsible financial behavior. The lack of clear disclosure in influencer marketing campaigns further erodes trust and prevents young consumers from making informed decisions.

This aggressive push by prediction markets raises broader questions about consumer protection, especially for novel financial technologies. While some regulatory bodies, like the CFTC, oversee aspects of these platforms, the specific safeguards for young adults and the prevention of gambling-like harms often lag behind the rapid pace of innovation. The potential for addiction, significant financial debt, and the normalization of speculative behavior among a generation already facing economic uncertainties are serious concerns that warrant closer scrutiny from regulators, educational institutions, and public health advocates. Without more stringent oversight and clear ethical guidelines, the aggressive recruitment of young users by prediction markets risks cultivating a generation predisposed to high-risk financial activities with potentially devastating personal consequences.

**More on prediction markets:** *Polymarket Quietly Takes Down Bet On Nuclear Detonation*